Difference between revisions of "User talk:WikiSysop"

From DOSBoxWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Questionable deletion)
 
(→‎Questionable deletion: Please keep the discussion in once place)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Can you explain why you censored [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=TOOLS:ScummVM&diff=next&oldid=3635 this section]? You didn't even include any edit summary. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 
Can you explain why you censored [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=TOOLS:ScummVM&diff=next&oldid=3635 this section]? You didn't even include any edit summary. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 +
:ah yes.
 +
:The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports.
 +
:Which is not true.
 +
:Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small>
 +
::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me.  -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:50, 4 November 2010

Questionable deletion

Can you explain why you censored this section? You didn't even include any edit summary. -Lwc 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

ah yes.
The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports.
Which is not true.
Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSysop (talkcontribs) 08:49, 18 October 2010
If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -Lwc 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)