Difference between revisions of "User talk:WikiSysop"

From DOSBoxWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Questionable deletion: Please keep the discussion in once place)
(→‎SPAM: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small>
 
:Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small>
 
::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me.  -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 
::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me.  -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== SPAM ==
 +
 +
Would you explain why you didn't delete pages like [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=Cpu%2Fcore%2FIntro&action=historysubmit&diff=2253&oldid=2249]? Protecting and blanking is of course enough but since the wiki has such a strength "captcha" now it might be worth to delete such pages... [[User:Mabdul|Mabdul]] 11:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:28, 17 March 2013

Questionable deletion

Can you explain why you censored this section? You didn't even include any edit summary. -Lwc 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

ah yes.
The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports.
Which is not true.
Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSysop (talkcontribs) 08:49, 18 October 2010
If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -Lwc 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

SPAM

Would you explain why you didn't delete pages like [1]? Protecting and blanking is of course enough but since the wiki has such a strength "captcha" now it might be worth to delete such pages... Mabdul 11:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)